Why Denmark Is a Data Paradise for Scientific Researchers

Why Denmark Is a Data Paradise for Scientific Researchers

Years of lobbying in the EU has paid off for scientists in Denmark, who for years have the privilege of getting access to rich personal data registers without having to ask for consent. Interview with an epidemiology professor, who thinks that researchers should have more freedom to use such data.

Penicillin was discovered accidentally. The Scottish researcher Alexander Fleming studied the bacteria, Staphylococci, forming colonies on plates. When he returned to his lab after a vacation, he found mould in a plate, and no bacterial colonies around the mould, and said ‘That’s funny’. He started exploring this, which eventually led to the discovery of penicillin in 1928, for which he received the Nobel Prize. It became the most widely used antibiotic in the world.

Many other major discoveries, by nature surprising, have emerged out of unplanned and surprising observations as the key first step to new and often very useful knowledge. Because of data protection laws, and especially in the way they are implemented, it is harder to make new discoveries this way. The prevailing requirement that everything should be planned in detail before access to the data can be permitted obviously blocks for one of the most important steps in research, namely seeing something unexpected, and thereafter pursuing it by immediately checking in other data if it holds true.

Such is the statement from professor of genetic and metabolic epidemiology, Thorkild I.A. Sørensen from University of Copenhagen:

“Today, we have to state the purpose of our science project in detail, when we ask for permission to use personal data registers in our research. This prevents us from exploring data, changing plans along the way, looking for patterns in data without necessarily having a pre-specified purpose, and then testing in other data whether such new observations holds true. I think we should allow science making accidental new big discoveries like what Alexander Fleming did.”

Thorkild Sørensen has been following – and influencing – the development of data protection laws in Europe for decades, and is among the people, who worked hard to keep Denmark like a data heaven for epidemiological researchers. He was heavily engaged in securing the research opportunities in the political processes leading to the EU Directive and to the subsequent EU legislation for GDPR.

In the 1990s, Denmark was the only member state in EU, where research could be conducted on the basis of general register information without informed consent. When Thorkild got hold of the draft of the first EU directive on personal data, he quickly realised, as did many of his epidemiological colleagues, that if implemented as it was, the Danish research privilege would be history.

“It would have meant that we should get consent for everything we did, including from the deceased. Pretty absurd,” says Thorkild, who got a chance via the European Heart Association to go through the draft with the official in Brussels, who had drafted it. “We went through the draft, paragraph by paragraph. The commission had received many objections to the draft from researchers in Denmark and collaborators abroad. This came as a great surprise to Commission, not being aware of these research opportunities. Fortunately, they listened, and this specific part of the Directive was amended accordingly.”

His and others’ efforts, not least including persistent efforts by a Danish Member of the European Parliament, eventually secured the unique register-based research opportunities without consent also in the GDPR. Other EU member states like Sweden and Finland, also benefit from this adaptation of the European rules. However, according to Thorkild, the escape clauses are of particular value for Denmark because of several unique national registers that are older than what other countries have access, e.g. the Danish Cancer Register that dates back to 1942. This allows investigations over very long time periods and makes the requirement of consent impossible to fulfill.

No Opting Out

Thorkild Sørensen is very pleased with the political approval that Danes today cannot opt out of the allowance to use the personal data for research. Opting out would very likely create serious biases and therefore possibly make the research of much less validity. As an example of the political support, he mentions what happened to the law about the ‘central person register number (CPR-no)’, assigned to all citizens in Denmark. According to a previous version of the law, people were allowed to opt out from being contacted by researcher, when they recorded changes in residence address in that register. This actually became an increasing problem when more than 10% of the population had done so, he says.

“When Margrethe Vestager (currently Executive Vice President of the EU commission) was minister of internal affairs, she recognized the problem with the opting out and therefore proposed the Parliament to remove it, also with retrospective effects. It was passed through unanimously, with the key argument that persons contacted could just refuse participation.” Thorkild says.

No Human Harm

As far as Thorkild Sørensen remembers, he has never encountered cases where researchers have abused personal data to harm any of the person(s) behind that data. The researchers working with personal data are not focussing on the identified person, but on what’s in the relationships in the data. If researchers are tempted to focus on the identified persons without consent, they are no longer researchers, he says.

He agrees that there are examples of abuse or risk of abuse of data, e.g. from private Facebook researchers (Cambridge Analytica / Facebook scandal) or in the cases where large amount of personal data has been accidentally released on e.g. CDs.

“Of course there are risks of abuse. However, if a researcher do this, it is a criminal act and should be treated as such. With no examples of harm caused by a researcher using personal data, concrete reactive measures make much more sense rather than the preventive measures used now. I don’t think this purely theoretical risk can justify the suspiciousness, stiffness and resistance towards use of personal data in scientific research prevailing in some circles that have led to the very tedious bureaucratic procedures to get access to such data.”

However, Thorkild Sørensen recognizes that this manifest would require full openness and transparency plus ethical and legal oversight over the use of personal data to keep the research privileges of today. His hope is that the implementation of the GDPR as times goes by will be much more researcher-friendly and pragmatic than it is by now.

Box: Article 5 in GDPR is regulating scientists’ use of personal data without consent:
“Personal data shall be collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes; further processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes shall, in accordance with Article 89(1), not be considered to be incompatible with the initial purposes (‘purpose limitation’)”

  • 720p
    Posted at 22:27h, 29 January Reply

    I blog often and I really appreciate your content. Chery Germayne MacDougall

  • 123movies
    Posted at 05:12h, 31 January Reply

    Paragraph writing is also a fun, if you be acquainted with after that you can write otherwise it is complicated to write.| Bekki Drew Hugon

  • bollywood
    Posted at 15:51h, 31 January Reply

    I am not sure where you are getting your information, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for excellent information I was looking for this info for my mission.| Christabel Durante Billmyre

  • hindi movie
    Posted at 01:24h, 01 February Reply

    I think the problem for me is the energistically benchmark focused growth strategies via superior supply chains. Compellingly reintermediate mission-critical potentialities whereas cross functional scenarios. Phosfluorescently re-engineer distributed processes without standardized supply chains. Quickly initiate efficient initiatives without wireless web services. Interactively underwhelm turnkey initiatives before high-payoff relationships. Laura Galvin Krys

  • dublaj
    Posted at 23:43h, 01 February Reply

    I was able to find good advice from your blog articles. Marlane Cortie Orv

  • 123movies
    Posted at 02:37h, 02 February Reply

    Thanks for the blog post. Really thank you! Want more. Tierney Akim Tab

  • hindi movie
    Posted at 02:09h, 07 February Reply

    Really informative blog post. Really thank you! Awesome. Dee Kerwin Eadith

  • torrent
    Posted at 06:46h, 10 February Reply

    A fascinating discussion is definitely worth comment. I believe that you need to write more on this issue, it may not be a taboo matter but usually people do not discuss such topics. To the next! Kind regards!! Truda Wolfgang Haswell

  • turkce
    Posted at 06:49h, 10 February Reply

    First, thank you for taking the time to write on the topic and provide all of this information. The pre -travel installment was very thorough and hit on important factors that may sometimes be overlooked by a traveler such as the specific entry/exit procedures and the myriad of comms issues that can arise. The dual perspective was also beneficial in allowing the reader to see both sides of the coin to ensure all angles are covered. Thanks again for this well thought out series and I look forward to reading more of the content on this blog. Damaris Herold Rolandson

  • 720p
    Posted at 11:44h, 13 February Reply

    I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be a lot more useful than ever before. Luise Halsey Care

  • turkce
    Posted at 12:33h, 13 February Reply

    This blog was how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I ave found something that helped me. Thank you! Miquela Tirrell Lalitta

  • yabanci
    Posted at 13:08h, 13 February Reply

    Yes Beckita, Fox News is as conservative as Biden is a Catholic. Lauri Warden Calia

  • turkce
    Posted at 13:52h, 13 February Reply

    It really is not nuclear physics to find more views online. Whatever it is, it should really be interesting to obtain the viewers thought. There are numerous social media out there that will get more views. Mandy Wesley Herwig

  • turkce
    Posted at 15:15h, 13 February Reply

    check beneath, are some absolutely unrelated websites to ours, having said that, they may be most trustworthy sources that we use Erna Dewitt Tamas

  • turkce
    Posted at 16:06h, 13 February Reply

    check beneath, are some completely unrelated internet websites to ours, having said that, they are most trustworthy sources that we use Eada Orv Derinna

  • turkce
    Posted at 17:26h, 13 February Reply

    Awesome blog post. Really looking forward to read more. Awesome. Pansie Calvin Dyche

  • turkce
    Posted at 19:27h, 13 February Reply

    You are so awesome for helping me solve this mystery. Laurianne Alfie Kristof

  • turkce
    Posted at 17:32h, 16 February Reply

    I was wondering if you ever considered changing the page layout of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better? Berni Thedric Tamsky

Post A Comment